Home > News > A Novel Way to Measure Water Demand

Since 2012, Kendall DeJonge, an ag engineer with USDA’s Agricultural Research Service, and other researchers at the Water Management and Systems Research Unit in Colorado have been using a kind of infrared temperature sensor on corn canopies.

The goal, DeJonge says, is to quantify evapotranspiration (ET) under limited irrigation and find strategies to optimize production in situations where less water is available. “We’re comparing full irrigation where we give it all the water to limited irrigation,” he says. “We’re trying to quantify how much water the crop uses if we intentionally stress it.”

Accounting for spatial variability
DeJonge notes an ongoing challenge is measuring spatial and temporal variability simultaneously. For example, if a center pivot crosses part of a field and the canopy temperature suddenly drops, it’s difficult to account for that change in that part of the field at that point in time.

So, in addition to IRT measurements to provide canopy temperature information from the ground, DeJonge and Huihui Zhang, physical scientist at the Water Management and Systems Research Unit, are using an unmanned aerial vehicle equipped with a FLIR  Tau 2 thermal camera to spatially measure crop canopy temperatures across the field.

They’re also using a neutron probe, as well as a time-domain reflectometry (TDR) sensor, to collect soil moisture data weekly to determine how much water is being used by the crop and lost to deep percolation and runoff, to get a more complete picture of the water balance.

“The idea is the more canopy you have, the more water it’s going to use. If you have a small crop and you’re not covering a lot of the ground yet, you’re not using much water,” DeJonge says. “If your crop is under stress, you’re actually going to be using less water. If your crop is under stress, you get leaves starting to wilt up, and they actually get warmer because they’re transpiring less.”

New way to calculate crop water use
While fully irrigated fields tend to have more stable canopy temperatures throughout the day, deficit-irrigated fields fluctuate more. The difference between those two is what DeJonge calls “Degrees Above Non-stressed,” or the DANS index.

As part of his research, DeJonge is comparing different indices like the Crop Water Stress Index (CWSI) and DANS. These stress indices are plugged into equations — along with coefficients for canopy cover and reference ET — to calculate crop water use for irrigation scheduling decisions.

Comparing these indices, DeJonge hopes to determine the best options for deficit irrigation strategies or situations where, either due to low-capacity wells or allocations, irrigators don’t have as much water to work with, and need to get the most production out of the water available.

“If you’re fully irrigating your crop, it’s probably not going to be that useful, because you’re not going to be under stress,” DeJonge says. “But if you have spatial variability in your field, especially in soils, if you have sandier portions that are going to run out of water sooner, knowing they are going to get warm is something that could be valuable.”

The benefit of crop canopy temperature, he says, is it already accounts for these stress factors, as well as soil moisture, integrating them into a single value. What’s nice about canopy temperature is it already does that for you. That crop tells you whether it’s happy or not very simply,” DeJonge says. “The plant becomes its own sensor.”

Source: Tyler Harris, Southwest Farm Press


Be among the first to learn about the ever-changing crop insurance industry by subscribing to the ProAgMessaging system.