House Democrats Detail Some Farm Bill Concerns

The principal leaders of the House and Senate Agriculture Committees are getting their share of letters now as members of the farm bill conference plan to meet Sept. 5 in Washington before they get to the meat of talks on finalizing the legislation.

On Monday, 107 House Democrats wrote the four Ag Committee leaders to share their concerns about the farm bill. “Simply stated, we cannot support any conference report that undermines investments in critical conservation programs or our nation’s bedrock environmental laws.”

Every Democrat in the House voted against the farm bill twice on the House floor — once in May and once in June — mainly because of the work requirements and restrictions against state income waivers that are included in the House bill.

Monday’s letter, though, points to $800 million less in conservation programs and the elimination of any new enrollment in the Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP). Pointing to some of the benefits of CSP, including improved soil health, air and water quality, the letter from 107 House Democrats states, “Given the many challenges facing our American farmers, we should be working to expand our nation’s conservation programs, not cut them.”

House Democrats and environmental groups also argue some provisions in the House bill would eliminate water-quality protections for pesticide use and farmworker protections as well.

The 107 lawmakers also expressed concern in their letter for changes made to forestry management in the farm bill, which would come after more funding was include in the FY 2018 Omnibus spending bill to address the costs of fighting forest fires.

Lastly, the Democrats stated they opposed inclusion of the “King Amendment,” named after Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, that would prevent states from blocking the importation of any agricultural good that meets federal standards. The King Amendment comes after states such as California and Massachusetts have implemented laws that require food products shipped from other states to meet their standards. The House Democrats argue the amendment goes further. “This provision would virtually wipe out critical protections for communities and farmers that govern food safety, and air and water safety, workers’ rights, community health, food labeling, fishing, animal welfare, permitting, record keeping, invasive species, and procurement,” the Democrats wrote. “Instead of trampling on critical consumer and farmer protections, we urge the conference to resoundingly reject this provision again as it did in the 2014 farm bill.”

The full letter can be viewed here.

Chris Clayton can be reached at

Follow him on Twitter @ChrisClaytonDTN

Source: Chris Clayton, DTN

ProAg Quick Links

Agent Toolbox Grower Toolbox Careers

ProAg News

Corn Prices Heating Up

Despite the USDA raising 2018-19 marketing year ending stocks for corn in last Thursday’s WASDE report, corn prices moved higher to end the week. December corn futures prices returned to the levels seen before the surprising June Acreage report....

More Resilient Flood Control

In the wake of flooding that has inundated the Midwest, people offer different perspectives calling for more investment in flood control infrastructure as recovery begins along the Missouri River and in much of the Mississippi River watershed....

Why MFP 2019 Will Be A Disappointment For Some

The flow of meaningful information from USDA leadership about MFP 2019 payments has remained painfully slow. While there is no way of knowing the exact county-level payment rates, this week's post considers the big-picture impacts of how a 2019 MFP program might roll-out....
Get ProAg updates via email
Your browser is out-of-date!

Update your browser to view this website correctly. Update my browser now